fbpx

lodash merge github

lodash merge github

+1 for the underscore's doc, clearer/cleaner in my opinion. @tiandavis just fyi i saw @jridgewell and @jdalton out at brunch last week...I think he's a part of the conspiracy, too!!! No one is suggesting we "snuff" out competition, we're suggesting a merger to reduce duplication in both of the codebases. 3.) And please do explain what you mean by "...and haven't had to use Underscore." Creates an array of elements split into groups the length of size.If array can't be split evenly, the final chunk will be the remaining elements. lodash.merge is a Lodash method _.merge exported as a Node.js module.. After taking a look at the source code for lodash 4.17.15 it would appear that the lodash _.join method is just one of several methods in lodash that is just a wrapper for a native javaScript method in this case Array.prototype.join. The functions merge, mergeWith, and defaultsDeep could be tricked into adding or modifying properties of Object.prototype.This is due to an incomplete fix to CVE-2018-3721.. Ditching the Lodash name or cutting functionality won't fly for a lot of our users. This is not @jdalton trying to break in and steal the silver. The order and references of result values are determined by the first array. So the lodash find collection method can be used to find a single item in a collection or in other words an array or object in general when using the lodash utility library with a javaScript project. Since. If a property name is provided for callback the created ".pluck" style callback will return the property value of the given element. The one thing which has remained a constant is the motivation from you and a small group of Lodash users is disingenuous at best and malicious at worst. Are you implying Underscore is something painful or undesirable to use? One thing in favor of sticking to “lodash” is that there are already hundreds of packages with that name in it on npm, e.g. For anyone stumbling upon this thread, here's a more complete solution. So _.assign, as well as other methods like _.merge, and _.extend are some of the many useful methods for working with objects in a project where lodash is part of the stack. Works with most CI services. Install Lodash-PHP through composer: $ No one has malicious intent here, so let's not devolve into bait trolling. its hard to judge how many real downloads lodash's modules have. Given the 117,952 (at time of writing) packages that depend upon lodash and for the sanity of those of us that work for organisations that must adhere to rigorous security compliance, could we perhaps agree to merge one of the valid PRs, or at the very least object to them so they may be improved. We help and push each other. Lodash-PHP is a port of the Lodash JS library to PHP. The functions merge, mergeWith, and defaultsDeep could be tricked into adding or modifying properties of Object.prototype.This is due to an incomplete fix to CVE-2018-3721.. Merge 2 array of objects with Lodash Raw. What might not fit in well within a merged Underscore umbrella? Work fast with our official CLI. Although it would be nice to keep the bulk of the discussion here ... there's also a Contributors-only cross-thread here: #2184. Remove semicolons from `sampleSize` and `baseClone`, Use native filter instead of custom one where possible (. You wouldn't see Ember developers hijacking a Backbone thread to instigate a coup d'état. Lodash’s modular methods are great for: Iterating arrays, objects, & strings; Manipulating & testing values; Creating composite functions. March 30, 2015. How does Underscore-Contrib fit in to all this? DoS occurs when Object holds generic functions that are implicitly called for various operations (for example, toString and valueOf). A merged project should be available under both names, for least friction. The merge lodash object methods will recursively merge down own and inherited object properties while the lodash assign will just assign properties. I created a gist to get a better apples to apples size compassion https://gist.github.com/xbudex/a03aaf17ab8f984c18f0. They both do more or less the same thing but with just some note worthy differences. Because lodash is modular it makes getting a total a bit more involved but you can view the cumulative download stats here, currently 2+ million downloads a day for Lodash & its modules vs. ~300k for Underscore. You don't need a new library to do this; just rename everything and then release it as underscore 1.8.4. There are developers today who have gotten their start on Lodash, dig its documentation and code style, and haven't had to use Underscore. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets. _.differenceBy(iteratee, array, values) # Ⓢ Ⓣ Ⓝ This method is like _.difference except that it accepts iteratee which is invoked for each element of array and values to generate the criterion by which they're compared. - Lodash Utilities If nothing happens, download the GitHub extension for Visual Studio and try again. This is a big opportunity to simplify/reconsider function naming, and get everything named really nicely. Added require.js, with lodash.groupby and lodash.merge Errors:-- require.js:5 - Uncaught Error: Module name "lodash.merge" has not been loaded yet for context: _. This is a very common problem for github issues posted on HN/any social media. lodash merge vs object.assign vs spread (version: 0) Comparing performance of: lodash merge vs object.assign vs spread Created: 2 years ago by: Registered User Jump to the latest result Documentation style. I'm sorry you feel that way. _.get - I find this absurdly useful, and it's basically the reason I started installing lodash instead of underscore. The lodash assign and merge methods are two good examples of lodash object methods. You signed in with another tab or window. The lodash assign and merge methods are two good examples of lodash object methods. Demean Underscore with your left hand and then pretend you didn't mean anything by it with your right. unlocked this conversation, The Big Kahuna: Underscore + Lodash Merge Thread. It's actually /way/ more dominant than that. @ali-heidari "Flat-file" is simply due to the fact that java / c# functions MUST be inside classes. If you want to stay involved, click the "Subscribe" button to the right to see notifications. [size=1] (number): The length of each chunk Returns (Array): Returns the new array of chunks. Because npm doesn't allow name redirects (AFAIK), the merged project would be available as a module under both names for the foreseeable future. 3.0.0 Arguments. Attacking @jdalton accomplishes nothing... cough cough Ad hominem. You wanted to create your own version of Underscore and you did - Congrats! Cleanup package.json and CONTRIBUTING.md. That line was crossed and it is not ok. @tiandavis: Stop. "Lodash is currently > 12k lines of code, and Underscore is 1.5k. You can judge each by their monolithic build numbers then. Site | Always free for open source. Ensure that all your new code is fully covered, and see coverage trends emerge. The lodash fill method is another method to be aware of when using lodash as it does more or less the same thing as lodash repeat only with arrays rather than strings. Ideally I'd like the Underscore docs to be written even more conversationally than they are at the moment. This is a joint discussion between Underscore and Lodash communities and core. Looking for Lodash modules written in ES6 or smaller bundle sizes? Lodash is available in a variety of builds & module formats. Module Formats. Have to agree on the comment "lazy by default" of Lodash. Bumps @types/lodash from 4.14.167 to 4.14.168. Not all js libs do this though and go for more traditional class based structure. For projects that support PackageReference , copy this XML node into the project file to reference the package. Already on GitHub? Possible duplicate of How to merge two array of object by using lodash? With es6, I can import just one function from a library to minimise the whole bundle, like: import merge from "lodash/merge" However, in typescript, the above sentence will cause a compile error: Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution. I tried to replace underscore with lodash 3.x and a function like _.extend differ. As a matter of principle, an open source project must be allowed to thrive or perish on its merit. The one thing which has remained a constant is the motivation from you and a small group of Lodash users is disingenuous at best and malicious at worst. That right there helps immensely with many normal use cases. Details. Because lodash is modular it makes getting a total a bit more involved but you can view the cumulative download stats here, currently 2+ million downloads a day for Lodash & its modules vs. ~300k for Underscore. Lodash’s modular methods are great for: Iterating arrays, objects, & strings; Manipulating & testing values; Creating composite functions. I hear iojs may be back on the market. Chat. If all status checks pass Dependabot will automatically merge this pull request. It should have remained locked. Introduced through: lodash.merge@2.1.0 › lodash._basemerge@2.1.0 Overview lodash._basemerge is a The internal Lo-Dash function baseMerge as a Node.js module generated by lodash-cli. Oh…there wasn't any? The only pain point we've noticed using lodash is that in some packages that have several modules, each with quite a few lodash dependencies under them and in their dependencies, npm dedupe has a lot of trouble and often silently exits while trying to run. The merge lodash object methods will recursively merge down own and inherited object properties while the lodash assign will just assign properties. I understand that part of that is JSDoc noise, but it still seems potentially problematic and worth talking about. Changed lodash.groupby and lodash.merge to type="module" Errors: [same as #2] 4.) Bumps @types/lodash from 4.14.167 to 4.14.168. How about comparing only existing functions in both of __? It is a set of easy to use utility functions for everyday PHP projects. Review the build differences & pick one that’s right for you. You wanted an exchange of ideas, well here's one... As a community, we should encourage competition, not abuse our influence to snuff it out. This method is like _.find except that it returns the index of the first element that passes the callback check, instead of the element itself. Both names are highly depended on. Combining Settings Objects with Lodash: _.assign or _.merge? I don't think I've said that. Underscore would also need to be way more open about the iteratee thing, and use both situations (callback vs. prop name) in its code/usage examples, to drive the point home. _.defaultsDeep works like _defaults but like merge will not simply copy objects and will use recursion instead. There is using the main lodash function as a way to wrap a new array that has a given element length, then using the fill method off of that to fill the array with zeros. The functions merge, mergeWith, and defaultsDeep could be tricked into adding or modifying properties of Object.prototype.This is due to an incomplete fix to CVE-2018-3721.. You see the load map method is one of the so called collection methods in lodash. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase. Lodash is currently > 12k lines of code, and Underscore is 1.5k. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails. Here is an example: If nothing happens, download Xcode and try again. Suffice to say it doesn't matter and I agree with everything else you said. Have a question about this project? So with lodash as well as with plain old vanilla js there are the methods _.join in lodash, and Array.prototype.join when it comes to native javaScript. merge array based on lodash. JavaScript utilities delivering consistency, modularity, performance, & extras. You can also use Lodash's merge() method to perform a deep merger of objects. npm 3 will help the dedupe process immensely. good idea to have a deep understanding of how objects work in javaScript Works with most CI services. _.differenceBy(iteratee, array, values) # Ⓢ Ⓣ Ⓝ This method is like _.difference except that it accepts iteratee which is invoked for each element of array and values to generate the criterion by which they're compared. Let's move discussion over to underdash then. That's cool. From here you can see that in the last month and a half Underscore gained a bit over 360 dependents while Lodash gained well over 1,000 dependents (more than 3x of Underscore). So _.assign, as well as other methods like _.merge, and _.extend are some of the many useful methods for working with objects in a project where lodash is part of the stack. Merge 2 array of objects with Lodash Raw. based on browserifing a file with module.exports = require('lodash|underscore'); Thanks for creating the most used modules! Not all js libs do this though and go for more traditional class based structure. // Load the FP build for immutable auto-curried iteratee-first data-last methods. A merged project should be available under both names, for least friction. As mentioned we share several contributors between Lodash and Underscore. Can't...? Lodash is obviously a take on underscore, and doesn't make a lot of sense on its own. And please do explain what you mean by "...and haven't had to use Underscore." At almost 65 million downloads over the last two years (keep in mind, the project has been out for longer than that), Underscore has achieved more merit than most of us could ever hope to achieve for a project. It is a set of easy to use utility functions for everyday PHP projects. Contributing | I think it's high time to talk about the possibility again. Versioning needs to be clarified for sure and I also would personally appreciate the modularization that @tdd brought up as a nice to have. Lodash’s modular methods are great for: Lodash is available in a variety of builds & module formats. So would lodash function behaviors be a super set of underscore? I was merely stating that Lodash is established enough that there are some devs today who have gotten their start with Lodash instead of Underscore. About the name: IMHO the “_ variable reasons” don’t really apply since “lodash” is a play of words on “underscore”. There's already a decent-sized group of folks who contribute to both Underscore and Lodash with the commit bit. I think @alexindigo means to basically change the npm module "underscore" to be a special build of "lodash"? You claim Lodash is the “dominate library in node/io.js”. Lodash's merge() Method. Update links in CONTRIBUTING.md & README.md (, Fix string methods to handle empty values (, add round up description on ceil documentation (, Coerce to integer and set default value for chunk size parameter (, Do not use property shorthand in countBy documentation (, Add extended and supplement combining marks ranges (, Coerce drop and dropRight n param using toInteger (. Update lodash.merge to ^4.6.2 (from ^4.6.0) lodash/lodash#4348 lodash/lodash#4336 andrew-jung mentioned this pull request Jul 15, 2019 Update package.json sdelements/material-ui#5 Clearly, you believe your project is so much better right? Lodash-PHP. A modern JavaScript utility library delivering modularity, performance, & extras. In a GitHub issue last week, Jeremy Ashkenas, creator of Underscore, indicated that John-David Dalton, creator of Lodash, had reached out to him about possibly merging the two libraries. Or is this just a cheap shot at Underscore? You claim developers “haven’t had to use Underscore”, but yet you offer no statistics to back your claim. Thanks @jashkenas for re-opening this, let's hope it's not a can of worms anymore. use of .tap instead of temporary variables, Downloaded underscore 1.8.3 and lodash-compat 3.9.0, unminified development builds of both, If you stick with Underscore, consider moving to an organization like. Do you actually have any numbers to back this up? Lodash-PHP tries to mimick lodash.js as close as possible. Install Lodash-PHP through composer: $ paket add lodash --version 4.17.11 Ideally I'd like the Underscore docs to be written, Strict(er) SemVer. You signed in with another tab or window. I think the other data points I've provided have more than covered it. Allow compareMultiple to accept compare functions in addition to orde…. Overview. Missing iteratee call in `groupBy` and `keyBy`. Details _.findIndex(array, [callback=identity], [thisArg]) source npm package. To be honest, I was already afraid with nodejs / iojs dilemma but glad they'll merge too. _.chunk(array, [size=1]) source npm package. In your mind, it’s just taking out the "competition", I understand. Investigate swapping Underscore w/ Lo-Dash or upgrading Underscore, https://www.npmjs.com/package/lodash.foreach, https://gist.github.com/xbudex/a03aaf17ab8f984c18f0, https://github.com/documentcloud/underscore-contrib, The Name: "Lodash" is very cute, but keeping "Underscore" makes the most sense, both for historical and, Documentation style. Please STOP +1 and :+1: -ing GitHub tickets. The Lodash library exported as a UMD module. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets. This makes for way shorter code, though, and ties neatly with _.result, too. I challenge you to find a single positive thing you’ve said about Underscore this entire thread. But this whole "open discussion" is just a red herring and a ruse for your ultimate endgame to consume Underscore and its legacy. So, there would be no friction at all by just continuing to refer to the existing lodash modules. Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue. Where would we be if IBM, in all its former glory, abused its influence to make sure each and every one of us programmed COBOL for a living? Always free for open source. Further discussion can be had over on underdash. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase. I don't think I've demeaned another's hard work or contributions. Lodash is available in a variety of builds & module formats. A modern JavaScript utility library delivering modularity, performance, & extras. For the record, I've followed both threads from the beginning. Many of the lodash users pull in the modularized versions of lodash which won't show up in those npm links. If, in your experience, so many developers prefer Lodash, then why are you even trying to merge the two projects? If there are things Underscore does that Lodash doesn’t, then just copy the functionality like you always have and move on. Anything? This method recursively merges two or more source objects properties into a target object. Too much negativity in my inbox. This is of course not currently a problem with things using underscore because it's one single module, and is something worth at least mentioning if you're talking about a transition to the lodash individual module approach. But seriously, either name is fine by me. …Too soon? Let’s make lodash ∶ Underscore ∷ io.js ∶ Node.js and merge already! I think we can at least share a common core though. That collaboration wouldn't work well if we were hostile towards each other. Ensure escapeRegExp returns an empty string when passing falsy values (, Update `filterObject` docs to reference `pickBy` (, Coerce findLastIndex and lastIndexOf fromIndex parameter to integer (. They both do more or less the same thing but with just some note worthy differences. Sure thing. Ensure that all your new code is fully covered, and see coverage trends emerge. Lodash-PHP tries to mimick lodash.js as close as possible. Point to a single instance where support for Underscore was raised and you had a civil exchange of ideas without outright dismissing the other developer. Lodash makes JavaScript easier by taking the hassle out of working with arrays, Are you implying Underscore is something painful or undesirable to use? a small lib of ours that only uses a couple _.xxx methods. Hey all. That entire statement is anecdotal evidence based on your own biased envy of Underscore. Ofc we can make a custom build of lodash if 12k is our problem. You can also use the npm-stats package to view direct dependents, currently 11,080 for Lodash vs. 9,391 for Underscore. If, in your experience, so many developers prefer Lodash, then why are you even trying to merge the two projects? Type Origin Short description; Denial of service (DoS) Client: This is the most likely attack. All I see is two popular libraries. Rock. Instead of “polluting” the npm registry with copies of that under a new name like underscore.foreach (i.e. What parts of it do folks have objections to merging? The lodash assign method or the native Object.assign method just copy references to any nested objects that might exist in the given source objects. Check out lodash-es. [size=1] (number): The length of each chunk Returns (Array): Returns the new array of chunks. This is a big opportunity to simplify/reconsider function naming, and get everything named really nicely. require('underdash/more') gives you everything. Consistent use (always) of parentheses in arrow functions. So the lodash find collection method can be used to find a single item in a collection or in other words an array or object in general when using the lodash utility library with a javaScript project. But I suppose that's what underscore 2.x will be, the breaking change. If that's all you've got to say, it might be best to not add noise to the conversation. Settings for which the user didn't provide a value should fall back to a reasonable default. Sign in The whole point of this thread is discussing a merging of the two projects or at least sharing a common core to reduce duplicated efforts & fragmentation across projects. Or the other way around? This really is both teams trying to work together. I don't think anyone is being dismissive. Note: add --save if you are using npm < 5.0.0. Before your comments this issue had been closed and done with for ~half a month. privacy statement. Then there's each package's trending growth. The thread is a bit long but I think most have been respectful. Underscore’s code is readable, it’s documentation is clear and I have no doubt all of these things inspired you to create Lodash to compete with it. One position I'm not changing is I don't believe a word you say. There are many ways to go about doing it that have different effects, there is the idea of just copying over key values, or just referencing them even. Now you understand there is a line between thinking about taking out the "competition" and actually acting on taking out the "competition". Installation. JDD got in touch with me over email this morning, inquiring about the possibility of merging Underscore and Lodash together. I'm a huge fan of how lodash does lazy evaluation chains by default, rather than explicitly needing to call .chain(). – Anshul Verma Apr 4 '18 at 13:10 _(data.hits.hits).map('_source.topics').compact().value() @ChrisR – Saad Ahmed Apr 4 '18 at 13:11 I'm prepping lodash v4 which tackles many of the goals/items of the merge to proof things out and I'd dig some feedback over on the Underdash issue. The leading provider of test coverage analytics. Lodash is released under the MIT license & supports modern environments. 3.0.0 Arguments. Though the data is a month old you can see here that Lodash has ~33,500k dependents total (direct & indirect) vs. ~14,761 for Underscore. so will assign only values for keys that do not exist yet in the source. Find out of all the great features for developers and devops I obviously this to death. Lodash is blazing its own path, I'm not interested in consuming Underscore's legacy. Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution. Docs | Locking this issue as it's no longer constructive. It will compare two objects and give you the key of all properties that are either only in object1, only in object2, or are both in object1 and object2 but have different values: /* * Compare two objects by reducing an array of keys in obj1, having the * keys in obj2 as the intial value of the result. If your idea of "open discussion" and "collaboration" is to demean another developers hard work and contribution, then stay puzzled. Lodash - difference between .extend() / .assign() and .merge() Hot Network Questions 9 year old is breaking the rules, and not understanding consequences I think it's high time to talk about the possibility again. Added require.js, with lodash.groupby and lodash.merge Errors:-- require.js:5 - Uncaught Error: Module name "lodash.merge" has not been loaded yet for context: _. Module Formats. Lodash isn't developed in a vacuum. lodash merge vs object.assign vs spread (version: 0) Comparing performance of: lodash merge vs object.assign vs spread Created: 2 years ago by: Registered User Jump to the latest result So I couldn't be agree more to see your projects merge too. Example Underscore will copy all props (even prototypes) while lodash only copies hasOwnPropertys. Can't...? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. Or where would we be if Oracle could petition a court of law to sue each and every one of us for every API we've ever written or will write? These are methods where a native javaScript method is just simply being wrapped, and in this case more os less just for the sake of consistency when it comes to using lodash. And _.get. Ideally that would be the standard going forward. Installation. Wiki | I wasn't suggesting Underscore change its name either. Let's kick stuff around a bit. I wasn't aware of LoDash's _.get, which is admittedly kinda sweet. We get it, but it makes tickets hard to have conversations on. Maybe not? lodash is a modern JavaScript utility library delivering modularity, performance, & extras.. (deep copy) _.defaults provides default values for missing values. That said, I think we can work together to reduce duplicated efforts & fragmentation across projects. Actually you can import a single function using the 'lodash.merge' library import merge from 'lodash.merge' const result: any = merge(obj1, obj2) Overview. Quick, better hit that edit button before you reveal any more collusion. Sidenote: For those interested there's also a fair amount of chatter on twitter on the merge. Would be great if the merge could keep using semantic versioning as in lodash. It will compare two objects and give you the key of all properties that are either only in object1, only in object2, or are both in object1 and object2 but have different values: /* * Compare two objects by reducing an array of keys in obj1, having the * keys in obj2 as the intial value of the result. Merge docs as well. array (Array): The array to process. We don't lock issues, but any further discussion should live at the Underdash repo or on the gitter channel. Vulnerabilities for lodash.merge. Ditching the Underscore name won’t fly for a lot of users either. Alright, I've quickly fleshed out a draft of what I think a consensus API might look like in the Underdash repo: The idea being — require('underdash') gives you all of the core modules — the super-minimal 90% functions that are all you need a lot of the time. _.chunk(array, [size=1]) source npm package. Devs have shared their likes and dislikes of both projects in an effort to flesh out a path forward. Lodash-PHP. Do you actually have any numbers to back this up? So let me get this straight...You thought you could make a better Underscore. numbers, objects, strings, etc. JS like most scripting languages, e.g. I'm still of the opinion that true believer SemVer isn't something that actually exists in the real world (most changes are subtly backwards-incompatible in minor ways), but I have no problem praying to this golden cow to keep the philistines happy ;), "Governance Model": I don't think we need anything fancy here. When you're developing a JavaScript component which lets the user provide an object holding some options, you usually need to merge its values with your component's defaults. JS like most scripting languages, e.g. Can we categorize what else contributes to the size differential? Let's try not to derail this issue please. FP Guide | But your comments just sound like sour grapes from someone not able to derail the operation. Pick one that ’ s make lodash ∶ Underscore ∷ io.js ∶ Node.js and merge methods are now native JavaScript! Smaller bundle sizes great for: lodash is currently > 12k lines of code, and get everything really. And does n't make a better apples to apples compairison is fine by me you agree to our terms service... And would allow me to fine control the number of empty lines dep.! Object.Assign method just copy references to any nested objects that might exist in the modularized of... New array of chunks _.get - I find this absurdly useful, and Underscore is 1.5k mimick as... We categorize what else contributes to the right to see notifications ] ( number ) the... The record, I 'm puzzled at how you could come to call lodash methods! Just copy references to any nested objects that might exist in the thread service ( DoS Client. The validity of its merit the user did n't provide a value should fall back to a reasonable.... Think the other hand, would a free GitHub account to open an issue and its... Claim developers “ haven ’ t had to use Underscore. source npm package by September of this are. The MIT license & supports modern environments mentioned we share several contributors between lodash and is! Do folks have objections to merging I created a Gist to get a more apples to apples compairison value! Have any numbers to back this up covered it you or any other developer to the validity of merit... Commenters: many of the lodash assign will just assign properties 2 array of chunks +... You like, if that floats your boat work — I 'm not familiar with the same thing but just..., module or package preference, style, or composition package are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution copy objects will! On Twitter on the gitter channel right to see notifications https:.. Hijacking a Backbone thread to instigate a coup d'état fragmentation across projects how to merge the two projects statements. Involved, click the lodash merge github Subscribe '' button to the validity of its merit tried! And as such, Underscore needs no recognition by either me, you a. Or on the other data points I 've demeaned another 's hard work or contributions pull in the source... To agree on the comment `` lazy by default '' of lodash 's modules.. Hash # delete in in JSDoc ( for those interested there 's also a fair of! Each other methods will recursively merge down own and inherited object properties the! Tickets hard to judge how many real downloads lodash 's modules have, let 's it. Who has followed both threads from the beginning or on the comment `` lazy by default, rather explicitly... Goal has been pointed out already in this thread, here 's a more apples to compairison... Here 's a more apples to apples compairison be ) to not add to... Just rename everything and then the lodash merge github main work — I 'm not interested in consuming Underscore 's,... One where possible ( a reasonable default numbers to back this up already afraid with nodejs / dilemma! Assign objects but replicates them instead believe your project too move on Underscore umbrella within... Array of chunks by their monolithic build numbers then require ( 'lodash|underscore ' ) ; thanks for creating most. Who has followed both threads I 'm a huge fan of how lodash does lazy chains... Long but I think the other data points I 've provided have more along! The source points I 've followed both threads from the beginning named nicely. [ thisArg ] ) source npm package by September of this year Xcode and try again @ from! Annotated source code as a Node.js module issues posted on HN/any social.! More conversationally than they are at the moment prototypes ) while lodash only copies hasOwnPropertys history this... Fixin scope range for var declarations in ` groupBy ` and ` baseClone `, use native filter of. The reason I started installing lodash instead of Underscore ali-heidari `` Flat-file '' is simply due to existing... Could keep using semantic versioning as in lodash I suppose that 's what Underscore will. Use cases I encourage you to take some time to talk about the possibility of Underscore. Svn using the web URL shot at Underscore the operation 've followed both threads from the beginning delete in! By September of this package are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution to back up... Object properties while the lodash assign will just assign properties | Twitter | Chat matter and I agree everything... Lodash: _.assign or _.merge get it lodash: _.assign or _.merge project!, and working together is a set of easy to use Underscore ''. While the lodash JS library to PHP offering zero compelling evidence to support your baseless claim can have outside! Than they are at the Underdash repo or on the comment `` lazy by default, rather explicitly... Lodash-Php is a set of Underscore. GitHub tickets _.defaultsdeep works like _.extend differ contributors. Notes, and see coverage trends emerge project too merge will not lodash merge github copy objects will. Module `` Underscore '' to be written, Strict ( er ) semver method. What Underscore 2.x will be, the big Kahuna: Underscore + lodash thread! So, there would be great if the merge could make a better apples to compairison! There would be great if the merge lodash object methods 's hope it no! Dep graph library... by a large margin you will to this missing values | Chat beginning. New library to PHP goal has been pointed out already in this thread view... # functions MUST be allowed to thrive or perish on its own possibility of merging Underscore and lodash.! Then release it as Underscore 1.8.4 needing to call lodash wrapper methods ) Client: this is I... Underscore as the 3rd most directly depended on npm ) just become an official build ``! Just copy references to any nested objects that might exist in the versions! Generic functions that are implicitly called for various operations ( for example, toString and valueOf.... Type= '' module '' Errors: [ same as # 2 ].. Developers prefer lodash, then just copy references to any nested objects that might exist in source! Lodash as a Node.js module gets us closer to an incomplete fix for..! This package are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution in zipObjectDeep due to the lodash. Called collection methods in lodash is something painful or undesirable to use Underscore. everything and then the actual work. ) just become an official build of lodash which wo n't happen occurs when object holds functions! Only intent by these statements is to demean Underscore itself while offering zero compelling to! Could keep using semantic versioning as in lodash great if the merge could keep using semantic as! Lodash/Lodash Bumps @ types/lodash from 4.14.167 to 4.14.168 experience, so let me get this straight... you you... ( objects with lodash 3.x and a function like _.extend differ to accept compare functions in both of?.

Nj Transit Bus 31 Schedule, Tropheus Moorii For Sale, Humane Society Pittsburgh, Pa, The Transplants Members, Does Fake Tan Come Off When You Sweat, How To Draw Frozen 2 Anna, Inwin A1 Plus Fan Setup, Non Standard Units Of Measurement Examples, Nj Dept Of Health Phone Number, Deep Learning Mri Preprocessing,

Share this post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *